[Apwg-ipv6-papi] policy proposal done?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:35:31PM +0200, Daniel Stolpe wrote:
> > What sort of customers do you see that need more than a /48, without
> > being ISPs themselves?
> >
> > A /48 qualifies as "fairly big chunk" for me :-)
> 
> I'll give you one: the county administration of Stockholm.

Oh, *that*.

For some funny reason, this seems to be the biggest source of confusion
and complaints in all the IPv6 world.

"We want a big block for all adminstrative networks in country XX" *plus*
"oh, and every member state needs to be able to route their part of that
big block in an independent manner".

Heard that from DE, CH and ES by now...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/apwg-ipv6-papi/attachments/20130830/c9787cc9/attachment.bin