[Apwg-ipv6-papi] policy proposal done?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:05:44PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
> > Well...  "quite a lot of entities" is exaggerating a bit, I think - I still
> > haven't seen anyone show up on the APWG list and just plainly *propose*
> > that we remove the "no subassignments!" restriction on the PI policy.
> > 
> > I'd assume that if this we really hurting that much, someone might propose
> > to change it...
> 
> Just ignoring it is easier...

True, but even then we should have heard more complaints at IPv6 conferences
and such.  Eerie silence...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/apwg-ipv6-papi/attachments/20130830/a14dc5ee/attachment.bin