Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
-
From: peter h peter@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:36:25 +0100
On Sunday 13 January 2008 22.49, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:59:46PM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> > One thing that might help would be for a RIR to themselves emit a route
> > for any space assigned to them but currently not sub-assigned, a route
> > which would blackhole the traffic.
>
> Given that any more specific route out of that space announced by a
> "black hat" would just overrule that blackhole route, the RIRs would
> have to announce all the remaining address space as /24s (because folks
> mostly agree to not accept anything more specific than a /24).
>
> Some few 100.000s of them.
>
> Good plan.
>
> Gert Doering
> -- NetMaster
Exactly what i feared.
Is there any works-in-progress for authenticated enforcable BGP-(5?) ??
Or is there any other means of preventing illicit ranges to reach across AS-boundries ?
That would be needed if any attempts of better control of ip-usage is done.
--
Peter Håkanson
There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it
again ... and again ... and again ... and again.
( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
