<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- To: der Mouse mouse@localhost, anti-spam-wg@localhost
- From: Fearghas McKay fm-lists@localhost
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:21:17 +0000
At 16:56 -0500 13/1/08, der Mouse wrote: >Again, describing the current RIPE / RIPE NCC paradigm, which I see as >a substantial part of the problem. We prefer to call it bottom up policy setting which is peferable to top down policy setting. If you want to change the process to a top down process - that too is open to the Policy Development Process. Meanwhile I will retire from the discussion since you seem to want a different world but you want others to do the work for you. f
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: der Mouse
- RE: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: brett
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: der Mouse
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: Fearghas McKay
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: der Mouse
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |