<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- To: der Mouse mouse@localhost
- From: Florian Weimer fw@localhost
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:33:55 +0200
- Cc: apwg-chairs@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost, anti-spam-wg@localhost
* der Mouse: > But, in any case, the carrier enforces against abuse, so the registrars > have nothing to do in that regard. What happens if the registrar gets duped and assigns ressources to a fraudulent carrier?
- [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- From: BabyMatthew253
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- From: der Mouse
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- From: Dave Crocker
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- From: der Mouse
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- From: Dave Crocker
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: Re: Re: NCC#2007083003 Fwd: DELIVERY FAILURE:
- From: der Mouse
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |