<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: IRT abuse-mailbox things...
- From: der Mouse [email protected]
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:19:16 -0500 (EST)
> Because phoning cost money, it will always be a better medium than > for example MSN since it reduces noise. Better only for the complaint recipient - the putative abuse emitter. Are you sure that's the party whose "better" you want to let dictate the convention? > If your complaint isn't worth your money then the complaint is > obviously not that important and you should be able to solve it > yourself. And indeed, if faced with such a case, I would resolve it myself. Probably not in a manner the sender would like, though - usually just by blocking the offending netblock entirely. Life's too short to waste it on trying to help people who go out of their way to be hard to contact with their abuse issues. /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
- [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: IRT abuse-mailbox things...
- From: Philippe Bourcier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: IRT abuse-mailbox things...
- From: Markus Stumpf
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: IRT abuse-mailbox things...
- From: Jørgen Hovland
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: IRT abuse-mailbox things...
- From: Esa Laitinen
- RE: [anti-spam-wg] Fwd: IRT abuse-mailbox things...
- From: Jørgen Hovland
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |