Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] RE: [anti-spam] Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] I wrote aspam filter in Perl

• To: der Mouse < >
• From: "Clive D.W. Feather" < >
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:51:14 +0100

der Mouse said:
>>> The idea of advertising who is allowed to send for a domain is good
>>> [but] [d]oing it in TXT records is clumsy.
>> wouldn't the "RMX proposal" (draft) be a step into the right
>> direction?
> Only at a very high level.  It, like various other proposals, suffers
[...]

On one of the anti-spam lists I'm on, I recently saw a summary of the
various proposals in this area and the issues with each.

If anyone has it to hand, it might be worth posting it into this thread.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  clive@localhost   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  clive@localhost  | *** NOTE CHANGE ***
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Thus plc            |                            | Mobile: +44 7973 377646

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • [anti-spam-wg@localhost] RE: [anti-spam] Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost]I wrote aspam filter in Perl
    • From: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
  • Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] RE: [anti-spam] Re: Domain spoofing - was Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost]I wrote aspam filter in Perl
    • From: der Mouse