Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Contacts
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:18:11 +0100
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:40:08PM +0700, Dr. Jeffrey Race wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2003 12:44:29 +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> >Mandating your suggestion would surely create a 100% correct database.
> >But it would piss off all RIPE members to the extent that the
> >co-operative nature upon which RIPE is based would be irrevocably
> >destroyed.
>
> Why would anyone be annoyed by being asked to behave responsibly?
Look at the way things operate in the real world. Customer data is
changing all the time - employees leaving, companies changing their
name and (some months later) their e-mail addresses, and so on.
There's no way a LIR can ensure that all data is correct 100% of the
time - or that, even if the mail is correctly delivered, there is sufficient
clue level at the receiving end to actually handle the e-mail correctly.
Commercial relations are not "parent-children" relations, and it's not
our job to educate our customers in such a way.
Mandating a 100% correct RIPE database means LOTS of additional operational
cost, for a doubtful benefit. This isn't going to *stop* SPAM, it just
means "you get to hit the people that have had their resources stolen
by spammers more quickly".
[..]
> If you have a solution that works (mine will!) then let us hear it.
Your solution requires cooperation from the majority of the LIRs, and
I know at least one that will object.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 55671 (55600)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
