Re: Re(2): Explaining spam to policians (was: test message)

• To:
• From: Koos van den Hout < >
• Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:38:00 +0100
• Organization: Van den Hout Creative Communications

Quoting ColorNet Robin who wrote on Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 12:59:17PM +0100:

> It might be better to look at SPAM as we know it today as just a passing
> phase whose window of operation is limited to effective roll out of DNS
> SEC in an IPv6 environment

Exactly how is IPv6 and DNS sec going to change anything about spam ?

The only technical possibility I see at the moment is for mailservers to
only relay for mailclients that have a correct digital certificate (SMTP
AUTH/TLS).

                                          Koos

-- 
Koos van den Hout,           PGP keyid RSA/1024 0xCA845CB5 via keyservers
koos@localhost        or DSS/1024 0xF0D7C263                        -?)
Fax +31-30-2817051               Visit my site about books with reviews    /\\
http://idefix.net/~koos/                http://www.virtualbookcase.com/   _\_V

Attachment: pgp00002.pgp
Description: PGP signature

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • Re: test message
    • From: Piet Beertema
  • Re: test message
    • From: Piet Beertema
  • Re: Explaining spam to policians (was: test message)
    • From: Piet Beertema
  • Re: Explaining spam to policians (was: test message)
    • From: Piet Beertema
  • Re(2): Explaining spam to policians (was: test message)
    • From: ColorNet Robin