You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > Mailman Archives
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Another sad proof of why the industry can't handle the UCE issue

  • To: Piet Beertema < >
  • From: Jan Meijer < >
  • Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 13:16:00 +0200
  • Cc: Paul Wouters < >
  • Organization: SURFnet BV

> No. If I opt-out in matters like this, I opt-out for
> commercial announcements in the broadest sense of the
> word, *not* for important stuff like this. I'd flame
> them to death if they'd ignore my opt-out for other
> purposes.

What would you do if they ignored your flame?  You could block microsoft,
but that would do you no good, you wouldn't receive the things you did
receive.  No more [email protected]  That would be an option, but again,
you're already a customer, so you would want to receive certain information.

I'll stick to my opinion the vendor should provide a mechanism to enable
differentiation between different types of information they would like to do
mailings for. 


> We're talking about unsollicited *commercial* e-mail.

The commercial part I also forgot, thanks ;).  But it does not change my
statement I think.

Jan

-- 
alive=true




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>