[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Anti-Abuse Training: Next Steps & WG Input!

Hi,


On 23.02.22 20:00, Laura Atkins wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 23 Feb 2022, at 18:39, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +0100, Tobias Knecht via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
>>> I disagree with the idea of defining what abuse is for 3 reasons.
>>
>> I do understand your arguments, but I'm not agreeing with the conclusion.
>>
>> If we can't agree on "this is abuse" and "that is not", how can we ever
>> agree on "we should do something against abuse!"?
> 
> Exactly. We have to have some definition to use for training, at the very minimum.

(Speaking for myself)
The training is (at first) going to be a one hour webinar. So time is 
very limited. I am not convinced (yet) that defining abuse is a good use 
of that time.
Assuming that the goal is to make the participant of the webinar 
understand why handling abuse is important: Perhaps a few specific 
examples are more helpful to achieving this goal than a comprehensive 
definition.

Markus