[anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jan 17 00:37:11 CET 2020
It’d be interesting to take individual names of the people most vocal in their objections and feed them through LinkedIn - that assumption you made about dealing with spam would soon be tested. --srs ________________________________ From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:44 PM To: Sara Veronica Marcolla Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox") > I do not see so far any concrete proposal in the sense of addressing > issues, only shooting down proposals (for good or bad reasons the desire to stop a whack-a-mole does not imply a responsibility to make moles. a lot of folk here actually deal with spam, or likely they would not be on this list. this does not oblige them to support all proposals. randy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200116/48f873d5/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]