[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Sat Mar 30 18:35:28 CET 2019
On 24/03/2019 14:48, Sander Steffann wrote: > Hi Gert, > >> Now, I do share the wish to "do something!!" against BGP hijacking. >> >> So, maybe a more workable way forward would be to change this into a BCP >> ("the RIPE anti-abuse community states with full backing from the RIPE >> community that BGP hijacking, as defined in <reference>, is considered >> unwanted behaviour") - and *then* use that on a commercial/peering basis >> among transit ISPs to strengthen the message "we want *you* to filter >> your customer BGP sessions, because that's the proper way to run a network!". > +1 > > Cheers, > Sander > Nice but probably as effective as MANRS. Regards, Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]