[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Sun Mar 24 13:48:08 CET 2019
Hi Gert, > Now, I do share the wish to "do something!!" against BGP hijacking. > > So, maybe a more workable way forward would be to change this into a BCP > ("the RIPE anti-abuse community states with full backing from the RIPE > community that BGP hijacking, as defined in <reference>, is considered > unwanted behaviour") - and *then* use that on a commercial/peering basis > among transit ISPs to strengthen the message "we want *you* to filter > your customer BGP sessions, because that's the proper way to run a network!". +1 Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190324/4103ca53/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]