[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Fri Mar 22 13:17:41 CET 2019
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:09:24AM +0000, Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg wrote: Dear Carlos, >> 8. "So Legacy holders (resources with a legacy status) are for obvious >> reasons, excluded for penalties and out of reach. Also according to the >> policy that specifies services to Legacy holders, as this policy doesn't >> state that it wants to include and impact legacy holders." > > I don't agree. If you check i was one of the co-authors of 2012-07 :-) > In my initial drafts for 2019-03, there was a line about legacy holders. It > seems now clear it needs to be recovered for version 2.0 :-) Although I have mixed feelings about this policy and haven't made my mind yet, I wish you good luck with that one thing. Piotr -- Piotr Strzyżewski Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]