[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 02:23:14 CEST 2019
Fat fingers, On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:17 AM Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote: > Honestly, I think it's the opposite. If the NCC terminates a > membership agreement, it should be liable for all the consequences of > a wrong decision no matter how exactly the decision is made and what > arbiters/experts/oracles/grandmoms were asked for a definitive advice. .., because if it turns out that the experts or oracles prepared a bad advice, it would be the NCC's responsibility for not choosing a better set of experts of oracles. In any case, an individual won't be able to compensate a financial damage of an average ISP being shut down anyway, so it must be an org, and highly unlikely it could be that individual's employer. -- Töma
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]