[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 02:17:45 CEST 2019
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:39 AM Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > And how will a dutch court determine a wrong decision was made? by getting > a different set of experts...? E.g. by judging on an evidence found later, and with that evidence making a decision that original set of experts did their job poorly. NCC has arbiters for quite a while. Who's responsible for their mistakes? > It shouldn't be the RIPE NCC, if the RIPE NCC is just following > the defined policy. Honestly, I think it's the opposite. If the NCC terminates a membership agreement, it should be liable for all the consequences of a wrong decision no matter how exactly the decision is made and what arbiters/experts/oracles/grandmoms were asked for a definitive advice. -- Töma
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]