[anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 Review Phase Reminder

Thanks for the reminder!

Better late than never.

I strongly oppose to this proposal.

1) With a lot of words about improving trust and safety in Proposal's summary, there is no evidence about issues with trust and safety with uncheked "abuse-c:"
2) In my experience, real abusers have all their contacts valid (and responsive).
3) Why only abuse-c have to be checked? There are a lot of different contacts or information, that could be verified. 

Also, RIPE NCC executive just got extraordinary powers to revoke resources. So we have to be very carefull with policies, which may lead to resource revocation just because of e-mail issues (i had such issues with RIPE NCC mail servers).

Plus all other arguments against or concerning about this proposal, raised in discussion previously. 

Kind regards,
Alexander Isavnin



Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum