[anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

+2
Jerry Upton
Executive Director
M3AAWG.org

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net>
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com>; Ruediger Volk <rv at NIC.DTAG.DE>
Cc: aa-wg-chairs <aa-wg-chairs at ripe.net>; db-wg-chairs <db-wg-chairs at ripe.net>; db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net>; anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
Sent: Mon, Feb 29, 2016 9:10 am
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01


On 2/29/2016 3:09 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 29-Feb-2016, at 12:08 AM, Ruediger Volk <rv at NIC.DTAG.DE> wrote:
>> We have to assume that Internet number resource holders requested
>> to establish abuse-c
>> - usually are NOT focussed an abuse handling (different core business:-)
>
> With all due respect - assume that the number resource holder is a corporation engaged in, for example, brewing beer.
  ...
> Wouldn’t they have a corporate IT team tasked with looking at compromises on their network that are causing abuse / DDoS issues
...
> With abuse-c an external reporter can reach out to the appropriate team,
...


+1

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20160229/1c4704b2/attachment.html>