[anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01

Mon Feb 29 16:09:11 CET 2016

On 2/29/2016 3:09 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 29-Feb-2016, at 12:08 AM, Ruediger Volk <rv at NIC.DTAG.DE> wrote:
>> We have to assume that Internet number resource holders requested
>> to establish abuse-c
>> - usually are NOT focussed an abuse handling (different core business:-)
>
> With all due respect - assume that the number resource holder is a corporation engaged in, for example, brewing beer.
  ...
> Wouldn’t they have a corporate IT team tasked with looking at compromises on their network that are causing abuse / DDoS issues
...
> With abuse-c an external reporter can reach out to the appropriate team,
...


+1

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net