[anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Aug 12 00:24:19 CEST 2016
andre at ox.co.za wrote: >But: The very definition of abuse - has it changed? If yes, >what exactly constitutes abuse in 2016? - We may actually have to >redefine the definition of abuse? Oh now THIS ought to be fun to watch. Let me just get my popcorn... Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]