[anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Aug 11 23:37:06 CEST 2016
andre at ox.co.za wrote: >similarly - not giving criminals a "heads up" or null routing their >traffic and/or obstructing the functionality of law enforcement, laws >of countries and the rule of law - is not "free speech" For the record, I've _never_ obstructed law enforcement, except in one case where it appeared that there was a non-zero possibility that they might decide to prosecute _me_ for running a honeypot... an act which at least one very senior FBI official publically speculated might possibly be a violation of either the Telecommunications Privacy Act and/or the Stored Communications Privacy Act. With that one exception, law enforcement has pretty consistantly just ignored me, and these days I simply return the favor in kind. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] (no subject)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]