[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] Options for extending "abuse-c:"
Piotr Strzyzewski Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu May 8 11:51:24 CEST 2014
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0200, Denis Walker wrote: Dear Denis > At RIPE 67 in Athens, the RIPE NCC agreed to take another look at the > implementation of RIPE Document ripe-563, "Abuse Contact Management in > the RIPE Database." > > Two issues have been identified that are seen to be difficult to > handle with the current model - partitioned subnets within one > organisation and adding abuse contacts to more specifics for End > Users. The RIPE NCC has considered these two issues and found what we > believe to be practical solutions, available within the current model. > > More information about these solutions and the implementation of > "abuse-c:" is available on RIPE Labs: > https://labs.ripe.net/Members/denis/suggestions-for-improving-abuse-handling > > This topic will also be raised during the Anti-Abuse Working Group > session at RIPE 68 in Warsaw. First of all thanks for the proposed solution. I would like to comment both issues: 1. A solution to the subnet issue I perceive this proposed solution as a way of making a lot of mess whenever some customer marked with additional abuse-c leaves LIR. 2. A solution to the End User issue I like this idea. However I'm not sure why at the third screen there is RIPE-NCC-MNT mentioned, contrary to the LIR-MNT put on the fourth screen. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl