[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 12:14:04 CEST 2012
SOCA's point is a lot simpler than this nit that's getting picked here. "Company exists" (as a legal entity of some sort, registered somewhere) isn't quite seen as a sufficient criterion and shouldn't be seen as the sole criterion either. IP address justification paperwork is easy enough to fudge - say all the right things, copy and paste from boilerplate or whatever. The RIR certainly isn;t going to give you a /22 if you say you want to deploy botnet C&Cs on it, so of course you aren't going to say that. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Fearghas McKay <fearghas at gmail.com> wrote: > > Just because SOCA finds it makes their life harder doesn't mean the whole > commercial world has to change to make their lives a bit easier. > > Why do you find it disturbing that we can have different corporate > structures ? All registered of course otherwise they would struggle to do > business :-) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/638d5384/attachment.html>