[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fearghas McKay
fearghas at gmail.com
Wed Mar 28 21:59:50 CEST 2012
On 28 Mar 2012, at 20:53, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Fearghas McKay: > >> On 28 Mar 2012, at 18:57, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >>> Can RIPE NCC rely on the UK Register of Companies to validate requests >>> which aim to establish a UK business as a LIR? >>> >>> SOCA seems to suggest that the answer is "no". This is disturbing. >> >> Well since you don't need to be a registered company to hold LIR >> assets then that is hardly surprising that Companies House is not >> the ultimate source of all knowledge in this case. > > True, but a signature from an officer of a registered company should > be sufficient (together with the signup fee). If it's not, there's > something seriously wrong with the registration procedure. You miss the point - there are many different kinds of commercial organisation structures that are not Limited/PLC/Limited by Guarantee companies that can hold LIR assets and be members. Why should I be a Limited/PLC/Limited by Guarantee company just to hold LIR membership or an ASN/PA/PI/etc space ? Just because SOCA finds it makes their life harder doesn't mean the whole commercial world has to change to make their lives a bit easier. Why do you find it disturbing that we can have different corporate structures ? All registered of course otherwise they would struggle to do business :-) f
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]