[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris
chrish at consol.net
Mon Mar 26 14:12:11 CEST 2012
Hi, On 03/26/2012 01:43 PM, Reza Farzan wrote: > RIPE must create a revised policy regarding e-mail contact for networks > listing within RIPE database to ensure accountability. Oh wow, now that you said so, RIPE (that would be the european+ internet - how much is that, a billion pepole?) has to subject themselves to your wisdom... ;) You can, ofc, try the obvious: mazgarov at uznet.net ripeadmin at uzpak.uz Then again, seeing your mailinglist-contributions I guess it's highly likely that your mails might be considered the same as the probable reason there's no email attributes: spam. In case of a serious issue you probably wouldn't have a problem with postal mail. And while we're at it, regarding your 'accountability'-thing: you should really talk to some governments, being from the past (well...) they all seem to tend to regard postal mail as more 'accountable' than email... Surprisingly... Regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]