[anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK"
Tobias Knecht tk at abusix.com
Mon Mar 26 13:57:36 CEST 2012
Hi Reza, this issue is well known (see the list archive) and at the moment it is my fault to not come up with a new policy proposal. Sorry 24 hours a day is just to less ;-) I hope I'll get it done pretty soon, to have another starting point for a discussion. Stay tuned, Tobias Am 26.03.12 13:43, schrieb Reza Farzan: > Florian, > > If your statement--Email contact information is optional, is correct, how do > people contact a network regarding the abuse violations that were originated > from their IP address? > By calling them? Or, writing a letter using the postal service? This is > simply ridiculous. > > Again, if your statement--Email contact information is optional, is true, > RIPE must be stuck in the past, without realizing the necessity of e-mail > contacts. > > RIPE must create a revised policy regarding e-mail contact for networks > listing within RIPE database to ensure accountability. > > Thank you. > > Reza Farzan > rezaf at mindspring.com > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fw at deneb.enyo.de] >> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:50 PM >> To: rezaf at mindspring.com >> Cc: 'Laura Cobley'; anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net >> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] National PSDN "UZPAK" >> >> * Reza Farzan: >> >>> What is the RIPE policy regarding listing contact e-mails, >> especially >>> about reporting abuse? >> >> Email contact information is optional. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120326/6fd1fa99/attachment.sig>