[anti-abuse-wg] weird ERX networks ?

hi!

On 03/26/2012 11:43 AM, Frank Gadegast wrote:
> It could be, that this specific network was announced once and isnt anymore today.

ris says:
								(fist seen)			(last seen)
62.61.192.0/18  	25512  	CDT-AS CD-Telematika a.s. 	2012-01-23 07:45:22 UTC  	2012-03-16 11:38:08 UTC

> My main question was, why ARIN and LACNIC are saying, that
> they belong to RIPE and RIPE is saying, that they belong to AFRINIC
> and AFRINIC is saying, that they are worldwide.

well, arin doesn't get it, ripe and lacnic are consistent. i don't find this surprising.

0/0 matches any address, and discussing the actual content of an 'all' allocation wouldn't help anyone i guess...
that there's no assignment simply seems to be true.

> Should not any resource belong to one of the RIRs (even if its PI space) ?

it's obvious it's allocated to afrinic.
i think a rir's whois policy on its own allocation objects isn't really relevant for users.
at least when it's not 'my' RIR i wouldn't feel like it's my business...

regards,

	Chris