[anti-abuse-wg] weird ERX networks ?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] weird ERX networks ?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] weird ERX networks ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor Kottelin
thor.kottelin at turvasana.com
Mon Mar 26 11:59:03 CEST 2012
> -----Original Message----- > From: anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- > bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Frank Gadegast > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 12:44 PM > To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > Should not any resource belong to one of the RIRs (even if its PI > space) ? In the interest of picking nits: a number of /8 prefixes were allocated to non-RIR entities between 1991 and 1998 (look for 'LEGACY' status at http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml). The network you mentioned is not in any of those ranges though. -- Thor Kottelin http://www.anta.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] weird ERX networks ?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] weird ERX networks ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]