[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Mon Nov 28 22:08:21 CET 2011
Hi, > Can you please clarify if the only requirement is that an abuse-c be > published? For instance, if an LIR published an abuse-c with 100% > bogus contact data, would that meet the requirements and so avoid the > address space being reclaimed? The reqiurement that is defined in the proposal is that an abuse-c has to be published. The abuse-c will reference a person, role or organization object. The abuse-c is not an object itself. This means, the bogus data will be handled in the same way bogus data is handled by RIPE NCC. Hope this clarifies your question. Thanks, Tobias -- abusix -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20111128/fd67c81d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]