[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon Nov 28 20:00:26 CET 2011
Hi Tobias, [...] > So the questions is just what will happen if somebody does not have an > abuse-c. Since the "abuse-c:" is obligatory, the usual RIPE NCC rules > would apply (not compliance would constitute policy infringement and > would lead to the deregistration of the relevant resources, as described > in the closure and deregistration document under the section c.Incorrect > registration of the allocation/assignment in the RIPE Database: > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-517#b11c and > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-517#b2 > > But please keep in mind, that this process has nothing to do with the > proposal itself. Can you please clarify if the only requirement is that an abuse-c be published? For instance, if an LIR published an abuse-c with 100% bogus contact data, would that meet the requirements and so avoid the address space being reclaimed? Thanks, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]