[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] size DOES matter (sorry, had to use this subject :o)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steve Linford
linford at spamhaus.org
Mon Dec 19 21:47:11 CET 2011
On 19 Dec 2011, at 18:41, russ at consumer.net wrote: > This is exactly what Spamhaus did when they got sued and they posted all those > child-like messages on their web site. In the end the court found they lied and they paid all kinds of > legal fees because of it. OK people, I know I've been cryogenically frozen for the last 10 years but you really need to tell me these things... We were found to have lied by a court? When? And we paid "all kinds of legal fees" because of it? Why doesn't anybody tell me these things! Steve Linford The Spamhaus Project http://www.spamhaus.org
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] size DOES matter (sorry, had to use this subject :o)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]