[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud

Richard,

I have been following this thread now for a little while.

As the person responsible for staff and actions of the
RIPE NCC, I feel I have to comment shortly, before
taking this particular issue offline for further discussion.

On 30/09/2010 02:07, Richard Cox wrote:
> I outlined at that meeting my concerns; there have certainly been actions
> of a discouraging nature by some NCC staff.  I already gave you specific
> details within that meeting, and there is a broad convention that issues
> relating to actions of employees should not be discussed in public.

> So all I am willing to say here is that the tone of feedback *from the
> NCC* was unhelpful, and issues raised at that meeting which one might
> reasonably expect to have been followed-up by the NCC since that meeting,
> have not been.

Indeed. You outlined your concerns, and we asked you to substantiate
you claims, which you did not do. I can only offer again, that I am
ready to follow up, if and when you solidify your claims.

In the meantime, I reject any suggestions that RIPE NCC staff does not act
neutrally and impartially, as they should according to our principles.

And now please let us take this offline for resolution.

cheers, Axel