[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Wed Nov 10 16:25:34 CET 2010
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 16:18:36 Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > One mandatory place for abuse contact information. > > That is it. Nothing more, nothing less. > > Unless you migrate or delete data that won't be the case, you still have it > littered all over the place. > You can't migrate all data on a D-day. This will happen over time and the proposal I think addresses this by making the attribute mandatory. > > Imho you and Leo Vegoda are mixing up the data quality and the work > > quality. Data quality judges the quality and the accuracy of the data > > given in the object and has absolutely nothing to do with the abuse work > > done behind the email address. > > Again, this proposal has the risk of lowering data quality and people > should be aware of that. > I am not sure I follow you. Of course we can say more on the subject in person, over dinner or drinks, on the coming meeting in Rome :) Kostas
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]