[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Nov 10 15:18:36 CET 2010
> One mandatory place for abuse contact information. > That is it. Nothing more, nothing less. Unless you migrate or delete data that won't be the case, you still have it littered all over the place. > Imho you and Leo Vegoda are mixing up the data quality and the work > quality. Data quality judges the quality and the accuracy of the data > given in the object and has absolutely nothing to do with the abuse work > done behind the email address. > Again, this proposal has the risk of lowering data quality and people should be aware of that. Anyway, you and I agree that's clear and lucky this is a consensus model so I will stop here. Pointless to keep reposting the same arguments over and over... Groet, MarcoH (still no hat, getting cold)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]