[anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down

"Thor Kottelin" wrote the following on 23/12/2010 07:59:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg-
>> admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette
>> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:00 AM
>> To:<anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
>
>> In message<97C58E22-A243-4A57-9602-7184B5D3522A at blacknight.ie>,
>> "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight"<michele at blacknight.ie>  wrote:
>
>>> Instead of simply stating that they are alerting
>> us to an
>>> issue they start off with a long convoluted text about their
>> trademarks, w
>>> hich is totally irrelevant to us.
>
>> You're right.  I think the way that people in the news business
>> commonly
>> express the point you just made is that it is bad practice to "bury
>> the
>> lead", i.e. its important to express the major point you are trying
>> to
>> make (in a news story or in an abuse report) clearly, concisely,
>> and in
>> the first sentence.
>
> What was the "Subject:" line of the takedown request?
>
> (My apologies if it was already mentioned. The archive at
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2010/ seems to be
> broken. "Archive Last Changed: 01 December 2010 17:58 CET")

The lovely people in the NCC tell me this should now be fixed.

Brian.