[anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor Kottelin
thor.kottelin at turvasana.com
Thu Dec 23 08:59:21 CET 2010
> -----Original Message----- > From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- > admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:00 AM > To: <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> > In message <97C58E22-A243-4A57-9602-7184B5D3522A at blacknight.ie>, > "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: > > Instead of simply stating that they are alerting > us to an > > issue they start off with a long convoluted text about their > trademarks, w > >hich is totally irrelevant to us. > You're right. I think the way that people in the news business > commonly > express the point you just made is that it is bad practice to "bury > the > lead", i.e. its important to express the major point you are trying > to > make (in a news story or in an abuse report) clearly, concisely, > and in > the first sentence. What was the "Subject:" line of the takedown request? (My apologies if it was already mentioned. The archive at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2010/ seems to be broken. "Archive Last Changed: 01 December 2010 17:58 CET") -- Thor Kottelin http://www.anta.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]