[address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)

Hi Nick, all,

> 1. problematic edge cases in section 5 due to the magic figure of 50% utilisation
> 2. what is a "special circumstance"?

The proposal does not modify existing numbers (50%) or the "special circumstances". Both are in the current policy already (see old policy text 6.1 .4). I think the changes you propose should be done in a separate policy proposal as they are an addition to this policy proposal rather than a change.

Nevertheless RIPE has clarified how they handle the 50% issue currently (see Marco Schmidt's mail from mid May):

> When receiving requests for more than a /24, the RIPE NCC checks that
> the IXP will need more than 50% of the assignment within one year. If
> their growth rate is too slow and we expect that it will take more than
> a year to exceed that utilisation threshold, we suggest that they
> postpone their request.

Thus, this issue is not urgent and can be discussed separately. I hope that answers open questions.

Regards,
Matthias

--
Dr.-Ing. Matthias Wichtlhuber
Team Lead Research and Development
------------------------------
DE-CIX Management GmbH
Lindleystr. 12, 60314 Frankfurt (Germany)
phone: +49 69 1730902 141
mobile: +49 171 3836036
fax: +49 69 4056 2716
e-mail: matthias.wichtlhuber at de-cix.net
web: www.de-cix.net
------------------------------
DE-CIX Management GmbH
Executive Directors: Ivaylo Ivanov and Sebastian Seifert
Trade registry: District court (Amtsgericht) Cologne, HRB 51135
Registered office: Lichtstr. 43i, 50825 Cologne

________________________________________
Von: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> im Auftrag von Cynthia Revström via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juni 2023 00:55:35
An: Nick Hilliard
Cc: RIPE Address Policy Working Group
Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)

I agree with Nick here regarding 1.
These magic numbers should really be fixed.

-Cynthia

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:55 PM Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
>
> Angela Dall'Ara wrote on 29/06/2023 15:19:
>
> It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
>
>
> this version of the document hasn't addressed the problems I raised on April 26. The authors need to give some consideration about what might be the best approach to fixing them:
>
> 1. problematic edge cases in section 5 due to the magic figure of 50% utilisation
> 2. what is a "special circumstance"?
>
> I don't believe that the document should progress until these issues are addressed.
>
> Nick
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/

--

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/