[address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Fri Jun 30 00:55:35 CEST 2023
I agree with Nick here regarding 1. These magic numbers should really be fixed. -Cynthia On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:55 PM Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > > Angela Dall'Ara wrote on 29/06/2023 15:19: > > It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase. > > > this version of the document hasn't addressed the problems I raised on April 26. The authors need to give some consideration about what might be the best approach to fixing them: > > 1. problematic edge cases in section 5 due to the magic figure of 50% utilisation > 2. what is a "special circumstance"? > > I don't believe that the document should progress until these issues are addressed. > > Nick > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]