[address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Serg Galat
greysticky at gmail.com
Sun Mar 20 15:10:28 CET 2022
Dear Leo, Would you please say this to Athina Fragkouli. Or she can? On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 1:59 PM Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > Discussion of the charging scheme and how it is applied falls outside > the scope of the Address Policy WG. > > The RIPE NCC's membership has a discussion list. That is the right > place to discuss this topic: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/member-support/membership-mailing-lists/subscribing-to-members-discuss > > It is worth noting that there are active discussions of charging > related topics on that list. > > Kind regards, > > Leo Vegoda for the Address Policy WG Co-Chairs > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 2:29 AM Stary Bezpiek > <stary.bezpiecznik at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > W dniu 19.03.2022 o 06:59, Taras Heichenko pisze: > > > Peace. > > > > > > I am glad to see that RIPE NCC is legally clean. There are questions about humanism but of course this is not a cope of work of RIPE NCC. > > > > In my opinion - it is not. > > RIPE NCC claims to operate in accordance with its own policies, that are > > created by the community. > > > > Meanwhile, we have a selective treatment of Members in terms of payments > > without: > > a) RIPE NCC resolutions > > b) without annexes to contracts with users. > > c) policy change > > Neither the Agreement nor the existing policies allow for discretionary > > behavior like "this user may not pay, and others must" without formal > > authorization. > > > > Of course Ukraine as an attacked country can and must be treated with > > any aid, including exemption from payments, when possible. But it has to > > be passed by a resolution of the RIPE NCC ordinance. The resolution may > > contain one sentence: "We do not issue invoices to Ukrainian members > > until the end of the war." Vote: who is in favor? All? The End. > > > > On the other end is Russia, as a country that has been subject to > > sanctions. It should not be of our interest, that they cannot pay. In > > result, recognizing that Russia users may not pay, because they have > > "banking difficulties" means, that no one from Russia will pay. Without > > any consequences. Although they probably can pay. Letting go at this > > point is very unfair to other Members. > > > > I also have a difficult in payment because the Euro exchange rate is > > very high. Does it interest someone? > > > > -- > > Stary Bezpiecznik > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg -- Sergey
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]