[address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Oct 9 09:01:22 CEST 2019
In message <a5331a3f-e773-4e14-8080-6ca39a0342d6 at www.fastmail.com>, "Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN" <ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote: >On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, at 07:37, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> I guess that I will have to speak to my friends in the DB working group >> about that, because there is *no* indication of this whatsoever in >> either the current -or- the historical records for the 62.222.0.0/15 >> block, specifically. > >Probably a less specific.... >When a less specific is splitted for transfer... Sorry. You lost me. I thought that we were discussing something that had been -aggregated-, not split. Did I misunderstand? Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]