[address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Wed Oct 9 08:50:38 CEST 2019
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, at 07:37, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I guess that I will have to speak to my friends in the DB working group > about that, because there is *no* indication of this whatsoever in > either the current -or- the historical records for the 62.222.0.0/15 > block, specifically. Probably a less specific.... When a less specific is splitted for transfer, the transferred chunk (didn't check for the remaining ones, but I suppose it's the same), has the "created date" of the transfer, but the date in the netname retains the date of the initial allocation. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]