[address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maximilian Wilhelm
max at rfc2324.org
Mon Mar 19 19:54:44 CET 2018
Anno domini 2018 Gert Doering scripsit: Hi, > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:34:25PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote: > > A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2018-01, "Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy" is now available for discussion. > > This policy proposal was prompted by the discussion at the last RIPE > meeting, where the NCC brought up the issue that the IPv6 allocation policy > talks about "organization" without ever defining what that is - "one LIR > account", "one legal organization" (which can hold multiple LIR accounts), > etc. > > Jordi volunteered to clean up the text, and here's the proposed changes > - but without some feedback from *you*, we can't clean this up. > > [..] > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 23 March 2018. > > Thus: feedback please. > - "the text matches the original intent as I have always understood the > policy, and we should go there" This. Best Max -- They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Ben Franklin)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]