[address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tom Hill
tom.hill at bytemark.co.uk
Mon Mar 19 18:27:17 CET 2018
On 19/03/18 16:47, Gert Doering wrote: > Jordi volunteered to clean up the text, and here's the proposed changes > - but without some feedback from *you*, we can't clean this up. Jordi's proposed changes appear to be within the spirit of the established policy, and I believe they do help to clarify the current requirements, as was requested/intended. I'm in favour of updating the document. Kind regards, -- Tom Hill Network Manager Bytemark Limited http://www.bytemark.co.uk/ tel. +44 1904 890 890 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180319/503eb43d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 New Policy Proposal (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]