[address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Tue Dec 18 16:28:34 CET 2018
On 18.12.2018 16:19, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > As I got flagged by one active participant in this thread what I would > mean by the below; whether it has been the NCC or the participant who I > felt is attempting to intentionally misguiding the audience? > > To be crystal clear: the latter of the two. And to also make this very clear: I am, however, very delighted by my observation that the vast majority of active participants here aren't easily to be take for a ride by crude assertions and wannabe arguments. This WG still works as designed, me thinks. :-) > On 18.12.2018 13:16, Carsten Schiefner wrote: >> Aleksey, >> >> your stream of argument: >> >> On 18.12.2018 11:30, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote: >>> I think the NCC wants to have Monopoly for IP selling and doesn't want >>> to devide profit with anyone. >>> >>> Of course it has more profit if there are more members with multiple >>> accounts or many different accounts of different legal entities witch >>> will pay for many years later. >> >> makes me sad. >> >> Very sad. >> >> As it is so... >> >> Ignorant? >> >> Fully intentionally misguiding? >> >> Deeply depressed: >> >> -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]