[address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Tue Dec 18 16:19:33 CET 2018
As I got flagged by one active participant in this thread what I would mean by the below; whether it has been the NCC or the participant who I felt is attempting to intentionally misguiding the audience? To be crystal clear: the latter of the two. On 18.12.2018 13:16, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > Aleksey, > > your stream of argument: > > On 18.12.2018 11:30, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote: >> I think the NCC wants to have Monopoly for IP selling and doesn't want >> to devide profit with anyone. >> >> Of course it has more profit if there are more members with multiple >> accounts or many different accounts of different legal entities witch >> will pay for many years later. > > makes me sad. > > Very sad. > > As it is so... > > Ignorant? > > Fully intentionally misguiding? > > Deeply depressed: > > -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]