[address-policy-wg] Fwd: Policy violation

Dear Aleksey,

Maybe you miss the point of having IPv4 resources (at this time).

It is not to resell and make a profit, but to use where the resources are
scarce, I think we can (still) be happy that RIPE and its members have made
a good job until now so that any new LIR has some IPv4 resources at their
disposal.

Kind regards,
Uros Gaber

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 11:31 AM Aleksey Bulgakov <aleksbulgakov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think the NCC wants to have Monopoly for IP selling and doesn't want to
> devide profit with anyone.
>
> Of course it has more profit if there are more members with multiple
> accounts or many different accounts of different legal entities witch will
> pay for many years later.
>
> вт, 18 дек. 2018 г., 12:40 Gert Doering gert at space.net:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 12:37:40PM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
>> > So then the NCC will say that it's non-commercial organization.
>>
>> This is not about making money.  It is about making it clear that
>> you can't just get cheap /22s from the RIPE NCC.
>>
>> But you know all that.
>>
>> Gert Doering
>>         -- NetMaster
>> --
>> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>>
>> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
>> Emmer
>> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
>> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20181218/2ff9cc80/attachment.html>