[address-policy-wg] Policy violation

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:30:11PM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
> I think the NCC wants to have Monopoly for IP selling and doesn't want to
> devide profit with anyone.
> 
> Of course it has more profit if there are more members with multiple
> accounts or many different accounts of different legal entities witch will
> pay for many years later.

We understand that you are unhappy that you cannot get IPv4 addresses in
unlimited amounts for free from the RIPE NCC anymore.  This is unfortunate,
but a fact of live that you share with everybody else who wants more
IPv4 addresses.

The policies work nicely as designed: stopping those that do not care
about others from using up all the remaining addresses in a selfish
manner.

So, please stop complaining.  You are just wasting everyone else's time.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20181218/ce7d87a2/attachment.sig>