[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Thu Nov 9 21:37:48 CET 2017
Ondřej Caletka wrote: > The only difference is that with PI, the it is the RIPE NCC evaluating > the rules, which seem to be too strict in considering what should count > as sub-assignment. But if we try to fix this, let's keep the fix working > both for PI and PA addresses. Just because the problem is not visible in > PA world does not mean it does not exist there. I see what you mean here, but this is something that has been almost universally ignored for PA assignments since forever. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]