[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

* Gert Doering <gert at space.net> [2017-11-08 11:43]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:20:34AM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> > Ok, here is it then. Hopefully we have a lot of fun and good noise ;-) (that's music?)
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> So, basically, we have two possible approaches here:
> 
> proposed by Max (active proposal): 
>   keep the IPv6 PI policy as somewhat restrictive, trying to find wording 
>   that permits "some generally accepted" use-cases where other people's 
>   devices can get numbers from someone's IPv6 PI block
> 
> or, 
> 
> proposed by Jordi (new direction):
>   completely remove the restrictions on "letting other people use parts 
>   of someone's IPv6 PI block"

I support 2016-04. It solves real problems that people have right now
and is easy to understand.

By all means try to succeed with the masterstroke of unifying PI and
PA but I don't think this should block the current proposal as it
probably will require "quite a bit" of discussions and revisions.

Regards

Sebastian

-- 
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
            -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 614 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20171109/1e7659b0/attachment.sig>